🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Over System & Ideology

For example, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.